Danielle DelPriore is in my opinion: a dumbass.

Personally never heard of her.
but while i agree with the conclusion, i have to question things… cause in my conclusion… wait till the end for that.

Original here.

Do absent dads make for promiscuous daughters? Study finds lack of father figure triggers risky sexual behavior among young girls

By Sadie Whitelocks
|


Knock-on effect: Women whose dads were absent during childhood are more likely to be sexually promiscuous, according to a new study

Knock-on effect: Women whose dads were absent during childhood are more likely to be sexually promiscuous, according to a new study

Girls whose dads are absent during childhood are more likely be sexually promiscuous later in life, according to a new study.
Researchers from Texas Christian University in Fort Worth quizzed 64 female students on their father-daughter bond and prompted them to answer various questions on sex, including condom use and frequency.
They found those who had unstable or non-existent paternal relationships were more likely to lose their virginity at an earlier age and display risky sexual behaviors.
Lead author, Danielle DelPriore said the findings support an ‘abundance of research’ that points to the same trend.
Half of the participants involved in the study were asked to write about a time that their biological father was absent for an important life event.
The other group were told to detail an occasion when their father was physically or psychologically present.
Following the writing exercise, some of the women were asked to complete word stem tasks to assess activation of sexual concepts.
This required them to fill in blanks in 14 incomplete series of letters to make words (e.g., S_X, _AK_D).
Others were given a list of statements about sexual permissiveness (e.g., ‘Sex without love is OK’) and asked to rate their agreement or disagreement with the statement on a scale of one to nine.

Researchers found that students primed to think about paternal disappointment were more likely to complete the word stems in a sexualized way (SEX for S_X, NAKED for _AK_D) than those who were conditioned to think about fatherly support

They also revealed more sexually permissive attitudes on the questionnaire.

Miss DelPriore and her team write that their ‘results provide the first true experimental evidence supporting a causal relationship between paternal disengagement and changes in women’s psychology that promote risky sexual behavior.’
The study is set to be published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, 24 million children in the U.S. – one out of three – live in biological father-absent homes.
The National Fatherhood Initiative states that ‘consequently, there is a “father factor” in nearly all of the social issues facing America today.’

sample size: 64
really, fuck me gently… really? 640… is just so much work… couldn’t be bothered to sample 6,400.  OMG that would actually require… what’s that word again: work!

Lead author, Danielle DelPriore said the findings support an ‘abundance of research’ that points to the same trend.

abundance of research.  oh thank goodness.  thank you Jesus H. Christ, that my tax dollars are not funding this 64 schmuck question.  just had to get your 2 cents in on someone else’s dime huh?  You go girl!

Half of the participants involved in the study were asked to write about a time that their biological father was absent for an important life event.
The other group were told to detail an occasion when their father was physically or psychologically present.
Following the writing exercise, some of the women were asked to complete word stem tasks to assess activation of sexual concepts.
This required them to fill in blanks in 14 incomplete series of letters to make words (e.g., S_X, _AK_D).
Others were given a list of statements about sexual permissiveness (e.g., ‘Sex without love is OK’) and asked to rate their agreement or disagreement with the statement on a scale of one to nine. 

this is science?  what? huh?  holy shit at this point is an insult to shit.  Father’s being away to make money was not part of this study.  Dad is away on an important event because he has to fund her, her mother, her brothers/sisters, aging parents etc etc etc.  but no one says a word about that, oh no… he’s just the schmuck who’s away.  makin’ a buck or two, trying to keep things together.  does it matter that he cares for his daughter a great deal?  NAH!  does it matter that he’d like to attend the important event but is unable?  NAH  Danielle would have you believe that he is nothing more than decoration…. something to be looked at and then ignored.  speaking of which, if images.google.com under her name is to be believed… first 5-8 images, kinda cute….guess I’ll just ignore her.

The study is set to be published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

I weep for this publication… you’ve just taken yourself down about 3 notches from being reputable.

as for the last few lines in the article.  1 in 3 is 33%.
mayhaps it’s time for family law and family courts take this seriously.  beg pardon… only one up note I could think of.

ah… waiting for this, my conclusion:  Danielle is a dumbass… last to the table of “gimme gimme gimme”… of tax dollars.  kinda cute but no hb9.  waste of time really… but oh so good to grill… satisfaction … so nice.

Advertisements